In Which A Court Ruled and Larry Gives Toothy Blowjobs
Quiz time!
A two parter
1) You’re a three time loser who’s last chance to hit the big time involves an allegation of having sex and doing drugs with a presidential candidate. People keep holding your feet to the fire and telling you to shit or get off the pot. Your federal case against pretty much anyone you could name got dismissed because, “‘the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that … the action … is frivolous or malicious…’” An action is ‘frivolous’ when either: (1) ‘the “factual contentions are clearly baseless,” such as when allegations are the product of delusion or fantasy;’ or (2) ‘the claim is ‘based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.’” Of course, there’s no reason to tell your supporters about that because they’d stick by you even if Jesus came down and said you were lying. Still, it’s looking pretty grim.
A) Out of all the accusations thrown at you which is the best one to prove as true?
-
- That you really did have the sex and drugs you said you did
- That you really did do them with who you said you did
- That you’re not on welfare
- That you have your real teeth
B) What is the best course of action, then, to prove the veracity of your arguments
-
- Produce documentation along with credible witnesses
- Produce documentation along with credible witnesses
- Produce documentation along with credible witnesses
- Post a picture of your teeth on your website
I’m not claiming I’m representative of the general populace but if it were me, I’d probably choose A1 or A2. And B1 or B2. HOWEVER, there are some (although I truly hope it’s a tiny, tiny percentage of people) would choose A4 and B4. I thought the eyes were the windows to the soul. But I guess it’s the teeth.
BONUS QUESTION!
Some little asshole keeps writing about you to increase the hits on his own website because he’s really jealous that YOUR getting all of this traffic and HE’S just a hack who’s trying to make a lot of money off your name and (lack of) reputation. The best way to stop people from going to his site is…
-
- Stop linking to him
- Stop talking about him
- Stop sending him emails
- Give him his own page on your blog
The answer, of course, is 4. I didn’t have to tell you that, did I?
2008 Debacle, Blatant Assholes, Larry Sinclair, Navel (Gazing At), Vomiting in My Mouth, larrytards
Oh boy….actually go live your real life with friends for a day and the world gets turned on it’s axis. Thanks, Paul. I really didn’t need to see Larry’s teeth..
Damn that was scary, Hey a BIG thank you to Lar I now have roach repellent.
LOL
Looks like he needs to shave and brush his teefs but ugly is as ugly does.
Hey, guys, stop attacking him.
It not only gives him fuel for his little fire, but it justifies his statements to those that follow him.
Besides, it is no way to engage in discourse, in public or over the internet. If you really think that Larry is a fraud, argue with him logically, factually, and with evidence.
That’s the only way you’ll be able to expose it to the masses. Attacking does nothing.
Actually I also detected Larry needs to touch up the hair, yet should stay away from Nice & Easy (so passe and too much of a Wayne Newton look) and try a more natural highlighting,now Grecian Formula gives a much natural look to.
Also is this the new bathroom? Looks like you have a bit of a bit of mold problem starting there.
Yes, the bottom plate of teeth do look real yet flossing should be done, otherwise soon will need dentures like the top.
I think Lar should post any and all dental records including X-rays. A picture maybe worth a thousand words but who really knows if his teeth a real.
No, attacks are warranted. I’d tell you why but who wants to give away the store. If you wanna email me, I’ll explain.
Point taken.
Hello Paul and my new friends….
I felt it only pertinent to post Larry’s stunning photo on Flickr for all the world to enjoy. I even started a group where we can post photos (photo-shopped or not) onto a group called Larry Wayne’s Best Photos. I will send an invite to Paul and he can forward it to anyone but Larry! I want to drive the fat bastard nuts.
By the way, the title of the photo is fag’s with dentures and I hope you guys enjoy it. Pass it on as I cannot believe anyone is so stupid to take such a picture.
I’m following up in a few moments with the top lies told by Larry Sinclair.
Thanks Paul…the site is great and hysterical!
What is your e-mail, Paul?
Here’s the newly OPENED TO THE PUBLIC website with Larry Sinclair photos.
Everyone visit and comment as you wish.
Love-
Mitch!
So where do I get these Larry photos? I’m not particularly keen to see Larry’s gnashers (who knows what they’ve chewed on), but I do believe you can tell a lot about a man by the quality of his dentistry…
I do think it’s a damn shame that you took down your Larry parody videos – I’m pretty sure they were obviously satire and therefore a protected form of speech.
Do me flava and re-post links to Larry’s most random posts. I’d read his blog but every time I try to follow his wonky prose it makes my brain hurt.
Joust
When is Larry going to take a new polygraph like he promised? It’s been more than a month since the first one, so he’s out of excuses now.
You know it’s Paul’s BLOG web-site and I do enjoy reading the satire, it’s lighter & it’s comedy, if he says we should abstain from negativity he’s the boss, that’s all what I need, I believe this had to come from CONCERNED CITIZEN’s observations?and rightfully expressed. Paul if you list what’s not acceptable TRUST ME, I will abstain from commenting. Keep up the truly wonderful satires they are funny and do make me feel at times, wow, I’ve felt like this about… if it’s possible, had I expressed myself incorrectly feel free and delete these comments please.
Thanks Paul
This also goes for me Paul, sorry if this has caused you grief as for myself feel from to delete my negative comments as well, after all I do not wish to aggravate issues here. Concerned Citizen, I read your observation as well, some issues makes good sense to me, but Larry started this and it’s also Larry’s responsibility to bring proof to his initial allegations, he will be pursued by many people like me who choses to give him back some of his own medicine.
Oh God, please Paul, delete all of my ‘previously posted comments* I read them over(because of your message & Citizen’s) it’s not just the content, but grammatical errors but also incorrect sentence structure ,I am a CANUCK who is bilingual in both Francais et Anglais I best learn one language correctly before expressing myself, what a “MOROON” I am.
Marie
You can get me at hbee inc __at__ gmail.
Once again – attacks ARE appropriate.
Hey….Paul….do I have your permission to post some findings here? I don’t have complete details, but the information I have so far is more than interesting.
Let me know. Inquiring minds want to know!
[NOTE - The comment referred to in this comment can be found intact with all of it libelous goodness on Larry's blog here - http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/03/29/what-donald-had-to-say/#comment-1636. Please note that Larry himself posted it.]
Paul, I am leaving you this comment to inform you that if you allow Mitch the Bitch to post the knowingly false claim when the newspaper very clearly reported the burglary was committed against me and my home, I will hold you and this site liable for libel. This is because you yourself brought up the burglary of my Colorado home in 1999 and you know that Mitch the Bitches claims are in fact untrue.
Thank you. Oh, and the first suit it you want I can actually provide you the entire 18+ page recommendation since people seem to have problems with quoting the decision correctly.
[NOTE - The comment referred to in this comment can be found intact with all of it libelous goodness on Larry's blog here - http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/03/29/what-donald-had-to-say/#comment-1636. Please note that Larry himself posted it.]
1) I never brought up anything. Please get your facts straight as you insist others get their’s straight.
2) Mitch stressed that it was a theory. Theories aren’t fact until they are proven. Woodward and Bernstein theorized that Nixon was behind the Watergate break-in.
3) He could be making a sly point about making allegations that aren’t true. I’m not to judge.
4) I don’t know anything about true or untrue when it comes to this. I don’t know why you assume I would. Is it because you’re so trustworthy?
I was nowhere where near Colorado in 11/99. I don’t read Colorado papers.
The fact is that you posted the exact same thing on your blog. Does this mean that you will sue yourself for libel? And, I’m pretty sure you posted it before it got posted here. If you’d like I can post a link back to your comment on your site. Would that make you feel better?
I have a great big disclaimer posted where everyone can see it
Besides, in your world, you are the one that needs to disprove his theory.
Don’t you all, Hbee and commenters both, get nervous that a bunch of irrational (judging by their logic) zealots are out there searching the web about you, albeit badly? It makes me nervous to have semi-retarded folks trying to get the dirt on commenters.
This evening, for example, Larry is getting the web sleuths on the case of some Chicago-based IP address. Only the fucktards have already pegged the wrong organization. They Googled the name wrong, check “foundation” versus “fund,” not to mention the organization is using a third-party ISP for its internet, per my search, so it’s hardly definitive. (I know my company recently fired its ISP because of ownership/control issues.
Anyway, how far can you trust retards not to do something retarded?
Actually your multiple IP’s are coming up the same as Mitch’s. Wonder why that is. Oh, and the IP on that non-profit in Chicago pulled up exactly what I posted, and the persons other comments were spammed and saved. hat you think you and Mitch are the only ones that can pull up archived newspaper articles? You two are the only ones that have a problem printing them as they were found, you both seem to have this trigger editing finger to everything. I love you to Paul, after all you proposed to me first.
You may have pulled up the right IP (assuming someone didn’t use a million different tools that redirected there), but your Hardy Boy linked to the wrong site. The black fraternity charity is not the right organization, a real estate management firm that is working with three different Chicago colleges is.
You seriously need to get a grip on how weak IP addressing is as any kind of identifying tool. It’s the web equivalent of using the return address zip code on junk mail to find out where the paper was manufactured.
This boy-detective stuff is just hilarious – as with most of what LS and the Larrytards get up to I find it very difficult to fathom what his motives may have been – are they trying to work out who HBee is? They could just catch one of his gigs!
I also love the way that Larry seems desperate to drive traffic to this site. I only found out about it by following links from Larry’s site: He strikes me as an attention seeking type. I’m sure he’s never had so much attention as this fake scandal has developed.
Of course we get nervous, but what helps me sleep well is that there isn’t really any way to dig up anything on myself (so far as I know).
Concerned Citizen and John Freeman are both unoriginal and ubiquitous. In fact, I believe I took the name John Freeman originally from this YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHxyZaZlaOs
Anyway, that’s besides the point. The interwebnets isn’t really that reliable anyway.
For instance, who is to say I didn’t fabricate that rant about U of M with a little bit of googling? I really can’t legitimize the claim because I refuse to give out any more personal information, so there really isn’t anything to be done. I might really be coming from MSU, Thomas Aquinas, Wayne State, or some other such college.
Besides which, based on my research of the internet, I really think it should probably come with a warning sticker on the sides of the tubes that information travels in that says, “Anything that travels in these Super Mario World tubes is false, spun, or actually factually incorrect.”
It is SO hard to find anything on the internet with any merit regarding its honesty, truth, and worth. Instead, you end up with blogs much like that which belongs to he-who-must-not-be-named. That, my friends of all shapes; colors; sizes; and number of eyes and limbs, is why I take all of this with the proverbial “grain of salt.”
Sometimes I too get carried away, though, when I forget that I am talking to…uh…people of a less informed and intelligent caliber.
In typical Larryology, it is fine for Larry to dig and post the names, IP addresses, phone numbers and next of kin on anyone who “dare question his integrity”. Larry’s own blog states that email addresses will not be disclosed, but the minute someone pisses him off, Larry will tell anything. You see, Larry doesn’t like it when people who think he’s a lying sack of crap begin to uncover information about his family, their whereabouts or other tidbits about his past I’m sure he has just “forgotten” to mention while telling all.
Assuming the “Sinclair” family has no choice but to be identified, I’m relatively sure it’s his mother’s family in South Carolina he is trying to “protect” as he says.
I know who they are and how to reach them, but why would anyone want to harass an innocent family? Oh, I guess we would have to ask Lar-Tard that question. As for me, I would receive no joy in embarrassing decent people with such trash. They didn’t choose Larry as a relative.
Larry is doing his dead-level best to intimidate me. He identified the name of my 9-year-old son, my sister and her family and more. The bottom line….we don’t care as we have nothing to hide!
Larry is the ex-con who apparently still has serious legal issues in Texas (as I said and he denied over a month ago). I have notified authorities where to find him. This guy appears to wreak havoc wherever he goes.
Though Larry is now trying to blame me and others for his “Hungry Bottom” sex ad….I will say with no reservation that the ad was placed in Laredo by Larry Sinclair. I don’t care how “legally” I got that information, it was Larry Sinclair.
Also, the post by “Democrat in Laredo” were made by Larry Sinclair.
For the safety of HBeeInc. I will state for fact that his information is based on my knowledge. It has not been discussed with the owner of this blog, approved by the owner of this blog and to my knowledge, will be read by the owner of the blog at the same time it is available to the public.
Another note….for those who asked me about Larry’s email address “lws022737@hotmail.com” : lws are of course the initials of Larry Wayne Sinclair. The digits designate the birthday of Larry’s father, Lawrence Hubert (I think) Sinclair who was born on Feb. 27, 1937. Unfortunately (or maybe it’s a blessing he didn’t live to see this) Larry’s father died on New Year’s Eve of 1996.
Final note: IN MY OPINION…it is as important to question the accuser in a situation like this as it is to question the accused. It appears that Larry has not provided enough substantial information to even warrant a response from the Obama camp (unless morons like SisterRosetta actually believe I’m being paid by them).
Even Larry’s “Law Suits” are against people who he claims “Damaged and Slandered” his reputation on the internet. (How could someone who is (pardon the pun) “hard-up” enough to advertise for sex partners be worried about their reputation? Could it get any worse? I mean really…an overweight, ex-con, lying, homo who claims to have sucked off a guy he just met while snorting coke and on parole is worried about his reputation? Does no one see the irony here?
So as Larry and the Lar-Tards continue to investigate Barack and question his integrity, I will do the same with Mr. Sinclair. And then following that logic, he is free to do so with me!
Please notice, I have not mentioned any of Larry’s living relatives (though I bet the dead ones are rolling over in their graves) his address or the city where he currently is living or the first name or relationship to Mr. Caballero. Let’s watch and see what all Lar-Tard offers up.
See Larry….”The circle of Life…..”
Oh also Larry…..Habla Espanol? I bet you do!
More to come folks including exciting news from the BANK OF AMERICA!
Larry’s tits have sure been pinched by Mitch. He’s about ready to blow out his catheter AND poop bag. Someone said he likes to assault guards and Larry wants us to believe that he did have one such episode…ONE…he said. I have a sneaking suspicion that we could have learned more but he/she got cut off via Larry’s very unique open door policy.
Hey there fellow LAR watchers. I was wondering why old Lar hasn’t told anybody about me. I have been in his stinking closet far too long. I WILL NO LONGER BE DENIED. I was Larry’s favorite and BEST well endowed agressive top and I know he didn’t blow Obama because he was blowing me! HA, and I dare someone to disprove that FACT!
Paul, are we invited to the wedding? And here I thought that this Larry Sinclair was just a toothless, stained denture wearing, stretched bootie ho with really bad hair. Oh, I almost forgot, I heard he was also a slutty pottie mouth. So will you be Mr. or Mrs sluttly pottie mouth? And do you like the dentures in or out?
Thanks a lot, Mitch. With the information you provided on Larry’s father, I checked out some online family trees. They suggest that Larry and I are 18th cousins one time removed through Thomas St. Clere and Margaret Hoo. I don’t think that’s right. In so many ways, that’s not right.
Oh, and I see from your blogs your favorite food is sausage. That explains the “obsession” with Larry.